After keeping a different opinion from the opposition parties on the Gautam Adani issue, Sharad Pawar has blown the air of another issue of the opposition. This is the issue of the Prime Minister's degree controversy. Many leaders of the opposition including Uddhav Thackeray, Arvind Kejriwal are questioning the degree of the Prime Minister. Today in Maharashtra's Nashik, when Sharad Pawar was asked a question on the Prime Minister's degree controversy, Pawar turned around and asked the journalists, today the question of degree is in front of the country, what is your degree, what is my degree, is it political topic is? Unemployment, law and order, inflation are many such questions and the central government must be attacked on these issues. Today, differences are being created among people in the name of religion and caste, today crops were destroyed in Maharashtra due to unseasonal rains, discussion on this is necessary.

"I have been a public representative for 56 years, must have known something"

Due to difference of opinion on the issue of Adani, a rift is emerging in the Maha Vikas Aghadi in Maharashtra and Pawar is reading BJP's script. Such allegations are being leveled against Sharad Pawar. Clarifying these allegations, Sharad Pawar again explained why he feels that the JPC inquiry is not appropriate in the current situation. In response to the question of journalists, Sharad Pawar said, there can be a difference of opinion on what a member should say on an issue in Parliament. My opinion is that there should be an inquiry, but the JPC medium is not eligible for the inquiry. Let's talk about why he is not eligible. JPC is formed on the number of MPs in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. For example, if a JPC of 21 members is formed, then BJP has 300 members in the Lok Sabha, in such a situation, if a JPC of 21 members is formed, then BJP may have about 14 to 15 members in that JPC and the opposition may have 6 members.

I have doubts about how effectively 6 people will be able to work in a committee. Still, if the entire opposition is saying that JPC should be formed, then I have no objection to that. Sharad Pawar further said that this year it has been 56 years since I worked in the Legislative Assembly, Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. If a leader has been working in the law board for 56 years, then he would know something and that is why we think that instead of JPC, Supreme Court inquiry would be more appropriate, but if Congress and other allies want JPC, then we will not oppose it. do.